
Contributor: DIRGHA RAJ PRASAI
The Nepalese people are suffering because India, America and the United Nations are acting only for their own interests, which are different. India does not want the presence of UNMIN in Nepal because until UNMIN is here there would be international pressure against its nefarious intention of breaking up Nepal and it will not be able to conspire openly. On the other side, UNMIN has its own interest for not wanting to leave Nepal. The interest of UNMIN and America is similar and their concern is to destroy China by instigating civil war in Nepal. It might be mentioned here that the UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon, who is a former South Korean Foreign Minister is an American ally. But Nepal has more fear from India than from America because the infamous Indian intelligence agency RAW is working and implementing its grand design to make Nepal and the Nepalese suffer more. But if Nepal becomes unstable and a troubled land it might even affect the unity of India. Anarchy, if rages, go uncontrolled and beyond one single country's border. Monarchy in Nepal is a factor for the stability of Nepal and understanding between India and China. Therefore, if there is no monarchy in Nepal, it might pose danger to both India and China. This country was formed by the joint effort of the people and the king and no leader or political party has the right to destroy and break up this country by
removing king. It is a matter of regret that two years ago that India had laden the Maoist rebellion along with Nepali Congress, UML and others with the 12-point agreement for so-called full democracy. That movement th

at ensued after the 12-point agreement was not for a republic s
tate. The movement had stopped only with an agreement between the king and the political parties with the internal consent of the Maoists. In the agreement, it was agreed that the sovereignty of the country would be handed over to the people with the king as the ceremonial monarch. After the movement stopped the country failed to take the agreed path with the parties involved in the movement in the name of people's movement breached the agreement and overstepped the constitution. The South Bloc and the Indian intelligence agency used the Maoists, congress and UML to breach the agreement and to eliminate monarchy. This was a great betrayal to the country. Within a month of the restoration of the parliament by the king, the parties in the name of the parliamentary declaration, severely curtailed the power and prerogatives of the king enshrined in the constitution and they also declared the country as secular. Before the ink of the parliamentary declaration dried up, the parties out of their free will declared and forced upon the country the highly debatable interim constitution. The United Nations' Mission to Nepal (UNMIN) too failed to play an impartial role and at

the sign of India started coddle and pamper the Maoists and showing down the national army and the monarchy. It was most regrettable that the parties have not even formally informed the king about the interim constitution. That constitution which has been maligned by repeated and irrational amendments has lost it validity. Therefore, there is no compulsion for the king to abide by the debatable and anti-national constitution. Again, the parties forced upon the country the constituent assembly election. However, the election, which was postponed several times under the whim of the parties, was full of rigging and misappropriations. There were robbers and murderers and those wanted by the law were elected to the constituent assembly. How an election forced upon the country and done on the behest of foreigners can gain validity? As the party leaders and politicians do whatever the South Bloc and the RAW tell them. What every Nepalese want is there must be the rule of Quislings and criminals in the country. Nepal respects the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries, including India. We also respect the UN and its Charter. What we cannot tolerate is the way India, America and UNMIN made the naked aggression in Nepal. So, we want to request India, America and the United Nations not to play with the sentiments of the Nepalese and not to endanger our unity, independence and monarchy, the symbols of Nepal's sovereignty and independence. If the agreement of april 24th 2006 is not implemented and the Congress, UML continue following the path of betrayal and deception then King Gyanendra should before the Nepalese people, Nepalese and foreign guests, diplomats and other stakeholders make public the agreement. The parties have no right to establish an anarchic and authoritarian rule by misusing and misinterpreting the people's movement. The only way to save this country is to form a new constitution in the presence and the participation of all parties and the king.
1 comments:
Dear Editor
I am happy to see Mr Dirgha Raj Prasai article 'Breach of agreement and betrayal to people'. Nepali politics is currently exhibiting its ugliest face. Mr. Prasai is true to say Indians, Americans and UN are trying to swallow this small country. I do believe still there are some nationalist Nepalis fighting for the country. Mr. Prasai is a prominent example.
Looking forward for new exciting articles from Mr. Prasai
Thank you
Post a Comment